Call Us Now (888) 915-9113
In this article, you can discover…
In California, “community property” means everything you or your spouse earn or acquire during the marriage using community funds. It belongs to the marriage, not to you as an individual.
The title on the account and who earned the money don’t matter. It doesn’t matter if you kept two separate accounts or never shared funds. If you acquired it during your marriage, the default assumption treats it as community property. You and your spouse operated as one legal unit, owning everything together. When you get divorced, you each keep half.
“Separate property” means the asset belongs to one party as an individual, and neither spouse has to share or divide it in a divorce. Separate property includes anything you owned before marriage or obtained with those funds, inheritances, and gifts. However, if you co-mingle your separate property with communal property, the other party can acquire an interest in it.
For example, if a wife owned a house before marriage, this house becomes the family home. Let’s say the wife works and the husband stays home with the kids. The wife continues paying the mortgage with her income. Should this couple divorce, the husband has earned an interest in the home. That’s because they paid the mortgage with money earned during the marriage.
Determining what that interest is will take specific calculations. But legally speaking, half of what they paid into the mortgage each month after marriage belonged to the husband. That gives him a legal interest in the home for that amount.
Possibly, but you must be able to prove that your collection (such as a record collection) is pre-marital, separate property. You also need to show that you only added to it using pre-marital assets.
For example, say you bring a record collection into the marriage and only use funds from a pre-marital trust fund to buy more records. In that case, the collection remains separate property. But if you have bought more records over the years with community funds (including your income), the collection becomes community property.
It is extremely important to understand what actually counts as separate property in California, and why. If you don’t understand these nuances and can’t trace where the money came from, you won’t be able to legally separate and protect your pre-marital property from division in a divorce. You might, however, still qualify for reimbursement.
This depends on the type of debt. Normally, debt ties to a specific asset (such as car payments). Therefore, whoever keeps the asset after the divorce would keep and be responsible for the debt.
Credit card debt works a bit differently: the law generally treats it as joint, and both parties share the debt up to the date of separation. Depending on the intricacy of the accounts, it may be worth hiring a forensic accountant. They can determine which credit card debts accumulated after you physically separated from your spouse, so you can avoid responsibility for those debts. However, credit card debt from before you separated counts as shared debt, making you responsible for half.
From your wedding day to your date of separation, California treats everything your 401(k) and other retirement accounts earn as community property. My firm often uses the services of personal valuation and QDRO firm Moon, Schwartz & Madden to help value and divide those assets.
Once the court enters your divorce, my firm sends your 401(k), pension, and other retirement account information to this or another respected QDRO specialist. They’ll work their magic and send back a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). We then file it with the court and provide it to the financial institutions.
Division isn’t the only option — you may be able to negotiate to keep your 401(k) during settlement negotiations with your spouse. The best approach is to sit down with your divorce attorney and explain your goals. From there, your lawyer can help you negotiate for those outcomes.
Our legal and court system is what it is, and it’s the only court system we have. If you view community property laws as unfair and don’t want to risk a subjectively unfair order from a judge, consider mediation instead. My firm can serve you far better through mediation than through trial.
A trial is simply going to follow the law. In settlement, however, you can negotiate. You might ideally keep your 401(k), keep the vacation house, or keep primary time with your children, while giving up something else to the other party.
Once you go to trial and the judge gives that order, that order is what you must follow. Mediation, negotiations, and settlements, on the other hand, give you a much better chance at an outcome. That outcome tends to be more workable, fairer, and better tailored to your needs and expectations.
For more information on asset division and California divorce law, an initial consultation is your next best step. Get the information and legal answers you are seeking by calling (888) 915-9113 today.